I see Adam, a 10-year-old stranger, in a random apartment building on the Parkway. His head rests in his hands, his feet shake, and his voice whimpers. As an unsettling bombardment of fireworks and gunshots fire 50 feet away from us, I walk up to him, and he looks up to me. The words barely tumble out of his mouth, the shock still placed on his young shoulders as he says to me, a near stranger, “I want to go home. I want my brother.”
There was an active shooter less than a three-minute walk from where we were. Adam’s parents weren’t answering his calls and he couldn’t find his brother. They, like my friend group and many others, fled from the Art Museum and were separated when shots were fired nearby around 9:47 p.m. on the Fourth of July. A few gunshots had punctured the blissful festivities of July 4th, causing a blend of fear, adrenaline, and anxiety to gush out, all of which twisted through Adam.
Despite the chaos, the national media has scarcely reported on the shooting in Philadelphia as it does not qualify as a mass shooting. Therein lies the problem: while a disturbing epidemic, mass shootings account for a fraction of gun deaths in the U.S. The larger issue, the one rarely focused on, are daily shootings like the one in Philadelphia where “only” a few people are injured or killed. The majority of gun murders result from handguns, and, despite public outcry, just 3% from assault rifles. Moreover, to date in 2022, over 23,000 people have died as a result of non-mass shooting gun deaths compared with the 340 people murdered as a result of mass shootings.
These statistics paint an explicit picture: the U.S. has a gun problem predominantly centered on murders and handguns, not just mass shootings and AR-15s. Maps displaying mass shootings are shocking; maps showing the number of deaths from all shootings are appalling. Solving the mass shooting epidemic must go hand-in-hand with everyday gun violence. This isn’t to diminish the atrocity of a mass shooting, but to point out that, unfortunately, there is much more that is wrong in our country and much more that we can do about it.
Philadelphia is a prime example of the issues with everyday gun violence as 2021 was the deadliest year on record for homicides in the city and this horrific trend is continuing into 2022. In mid-June, a lawyer was shot dead on Penn’s campus at 38th and Spruce, and on May 30, a father and his young son were killed in Philadelphia driving home from a Memorial Day barbecue. The shooting on the 4th painted an even clearer indictment of gun crisis plaguing the U.S. These events, unfortunately, have led to hundreds of Adams throughout the United States. Clearly, something must change.
Solving this larger gun problem first requires a cultural shift by the media, politicians, and individuals to focus on mass shootings as well as other gun violence.
One idea: instituting community-based gun buyback programs which will create a difficult-to-attain yet possible balance between respecting gun rights and promoting safety for non-mass shooting violence. The appeal of gun buyback programs lies in their ability to simultaneously reduce the amount of guns in a community, provide a method to safely dispose of firearms, and, importantly, lead to a cultural shift away from guns.
The need for a solution became painstakingly clear when I woke up the morning after the Fourth of July to a phone call from an unknown number. The voice on the other line sounded young and shy, no more than six years old. He said to me, “Hi, I am Adam’s brother. Thank you for helping him get home safe.”
While I was thankful that Adam and his brother were home safe, I couldn’t help but replay Adam’s fearful words from the building lobby I had found him in just a few hours earlier.
“Why is this happening? Is it safe to leave now?”
Daniel Gurevitch is a freelance journalist who has been published in The Daily Pennsylvanian, Nobias.com, the South Philly Review, and The Northeast Times. He can be reached at daniel.gurevitch@gmail.com.
